<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Acquisitions on Aaron Hall, Attorney</title>
    <link>https://aaronhall.com/categories/acquisitions/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Acquisitions on Aaron Hall, Attorney</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 22:08:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://aaronhall.com/categories/acquisitions/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>MN Successor Liability in Asset Sales</title>
      <link>https://aaronhall.com/mn-successor-liability-asset-sales/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://aaronhall.com/mn-successor-liability-asset-sales/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A Minnesota buyer&amp;rsquo;s biggest fear in an asset purchase is paying real money for a business and then discovering the seller&amp;rsquo;s old debts came along for the ride. The reassuring news is that Minnesota&amp;rsquo;s default rule favors the buyer. The harder news is that the rule has at least five real exceptions, the most important common-law exceptions were partly rewritten by statute in 2006, and the residual statutory traps (tax, unemployment insurance, environmental, fraudulent transfer) are exactly the ones that produce the largest post-closing surprises. This article walks through how successor liability actually works in Minnesota and what the asset purchase agreement needs to do to keep the default rule in your favor.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
