Hidden Costs in Charity Donations: The Legal Implications of Undisclosed Third-Party Fees
Donating to charity is often seen as a generous act of kindness, an intention to support a cause or a mission that resonates with the donor. However, in an increasingly digital and interconnected world, there are various mechanisms by which a donation can be made. One potential concern for donors is the role third parties might play in these transactions. Specifically, what happens if a third party secretly charges a fee on a donation without the donor’s knowledge or consent?
Understanding Third-Party Interactions
Firstly, it’s essential to differentiate between legitimate third-party payment processors and other third parties that might impose hidden fees. Many charities use payment processors to handle online donations, and these entities may charge a fee for their services. Typically, reputable charities disclose these fees or absorb them so that they don’t reduce the donation’s impact.
However, the concern arises when undisclosed fees are levied by third parties without the knowledge or consent of the donor.
The Legality
In many jurisdictions, undisclosed fees by third parties, especially when siphoning money from charitable donations, are considered fraudulent and illegal. These illegalities can be categorized as:
- Fraudulent Misrepresentation: By not disclosing the fee, a third party can be accused of deceiving the donor about the nature of the transaction. The donor believes their full donation amount is going to the charity when, in fact, a portion is being taken by the third party.
- Breach of Trust: Donations are often made in good faith. By covertly charging a fee, the third party breaches this trust, which could have both legal and reputational repercussions.
- Regulatory Violations: In many countries, charities are heavily regulated to ensure transparency and ethical conduct. Secret fees can violate these regulations, leading to penalties for both the third party and potentially the charity if they were aware or complicit in the act.
Repercussions
Besides legal penalties, third parties engaging in such practices can face severe backlash. Their reputation can be tarnished, leading to a loss of business. Moreover, if a charity is found to be complicit or negligent in allowing such practices, it may face a decline in donations and public trust.
For donors, it’s not just about the money being siphoned off. It’s about the breach of trust and the potential that their well-intended funds are not fully reaching those in need.
Protecting Donors and Charities
For the ecosystem of charitable giving to remain robust and trustworthy, it’s essential that:
- Charities are transparent about all fees associated with donations.
- Donors remain vigilant and ask questions about where their money is going.
- Regulators continue to monitor and enforce rules regarding transparent financial practices in the charitable sector.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the mechanism of charitable giving has evolved with technology, the principles of transparency, trust, and goodwill remain paramount. Undisclosed third-party fees on donations are not just unethical; in many jurisdictions, they’re illegal. Both donors and charities must remain proactive in ensuring that the sanctity of the donation process is preserved.
Video Transcript
Is it illegal for a third party to secretly charge a fee to someone when they make a donation to a charity, especially if this third party does not disclose it to the donor?
The first question I would have is, who is making the donation to the charity? So I am guessing here that a person is making a donation to a charity through a service, and the service charges a fee for that convenience. And the service doesn’t disclose that fee to the donor.
Understanding Fee Liabilities
Well, in general, fees need to be disclosed in order for the other side to be liable for them. So as a general rule, a person is not liable for a fee unless they agree to it. But there is a big exception, and that is if it is understood that a service couldn’t possibly be provided without a fee, then it is reasonable for the parties to assume some fee is being charged.
So, without more information, it is hard to know which exceptions and doctrines to talk about in this scenario, but I think there are generally two principles guiding this. Fees generally have to be disclosed, but fees don’t need to be disclosed if it is reasonably understood that there would be a fee charged for a service and the fee is actually reasonable.
Fundraising Agency’s Impact on Donations
Here is a different scenario, but relevant: I was contacted one time by a fundraising agency that was trying to raise money for firemen and firewomen who were injured on the job. And they asked me to make a donation. Their arrangement with the nonprofit was that they would keep 80% of whatever was donated. So if I donated $100, $80 would go to the fundraising agency, and $20 would go to the actual cause. The question then is, is that legal? The answer is it is. And here is why: my donation was actually going 100% to the agency helping victims who had served in the fire department, but then they would pay a fee to the fundraising agency equal to 80%.
Ethical and Legal Considerations
Now, is that ethical? I don’t think so. Is it allowed in most states, or is it allowed in all states? I don’t think so. Since this time, there have been a number of laws passed to prohibit predatory fundraising practices where more money is going to the fundraising company than to the actual charity.
I asked the fundraiser about this, and he said, “You know, I realized that it seems unreasonable on the surface to pay 80% to the fundraising agency, but that is what it costs in order to hire employees to go out and raise money. And if we didn’t do this, the nonprofit would get nothing. So at least 20% of the money we raise, let’s say hundreds of thousands of dollars, is better than zero dollars to the charity. So that is at least the argument in favor of allowing fundraising agencies to take more of the money than is received by the nonprofit.” But that was set up where the nonprofit had a relationship with the fundraising agency and a contract to pay 80%. And again, many ethics rules prohibit this. There are also some state statutes that prohibit that.
Conclusion
If you would like more information about any of these topics today, if you are interested in a business owner and getting educated on common mistakes business owners make and how to avoid them yourself, you can go to AaronHall.com/free and sign up to get a number of videos and other resources to help equip you to prevent problems in your business.
This is for entrepreneurs, startups, business owners, and CEOs. Generally, I am thinking about companies with under 500 employees, even as few as one or two, because for you as a business owner or a future business owner, you can either prevent these problems or pay the much more expensive cost of having the problem and having to clean it up afterward. The purpose of this YouTube channel is to help you avoid problems, grow your company, provide great value to your customers and clients, create a great environment for the people that you work with, and experience the success that comes from having a good company built on best practices.
I am Aaron Hall, an attorney for business owners and entrepreneurs. If you have questions about any of this, feel free to put them in the comment section below. Look forward to seeing you next time.